| Home | Services | Workshops | In Print | Attorneys | Contact Us | FAQ | Links |

 

The articles provided here are for your information and use in publications. Copyrights cited for each apply.

Each reprint must include the author's name and contact information for the Law Offices of Herbert D. Hinkle, Esq.

 

Return to the list of online articles

 

Online Articles

Expansion of Community Residential Programs for People with Disabilities

by
Herbert D. Hinkle, Esq.

Herbert D. Hinkle Law Office
2651 Main Street
Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648
(609) 896-4200 or (215) 860-2100

I recently spoke at the National Conference of the Autism Society of America held in Kansas City. Here is an important impression I drew from this experience:

Last month's decision by the Supreme Court (Olmstead v. L.C.) should give further impetus to efforts to expand community residential programs for people with disabilities. The Olmstead Court ruled that the Americans with Disabilities Act compelled states to adopt comprehensive and effective programs of de-institutionalization.

Much attention has been given to expanding the number of community residential programs and the concomitant reduction in the number of people waiting at home or in institutions for such programs. However, these numbers mask the problems that is plaguing community residential programs throughout the nation and which threatens to undermine those programs.

Over the past decade, in an effort to wring more placements from community service dollars, the states have decreased and almost eliminated pay raises and cost of living increases for direct care staff. Funds for maintenance have been slashed from the budget. Consequently, direct care staff receive increasingly low wages (in real dollars) for high responsibility positions. No wonder turnover is high and good employees are hard to come by. Beyond this, physical conditions are deteriorating. These are problems that cannot be ignored. Eventually, the states will have to recognize that quality is being sacrificed for quantity.

A modest proposal would be to allow families to earmark social security funds for facility enhancement in lieu of forcing them to turn such funds over to the general treasury of each state. The loss of revenue would be negligible while improvements would be substantial. Such an approach would also spur private contributions by families.

 

Copyright 1999 H.D. Hinkle. All rights reserved.


Mr. Hinkle maintains a multi-state law practice with offices in Lawrenceville, Florham Park, and Marlton, NJ, and Yardley, Pa. Mr. Hinkle and his colleagues Ira Fingles, and Paul Prior lecture and write frequently on topics of law, aging, and disability, and are available to speak to groups in New Jersey and Pennsylvania at no charge. Call (609) 896-4200.

 

| Home | Services | Workshops | In Print | Attorneys | Contact Us | FAQ | Links |