| Home | Services | Workshops | In Print | Attorneys | Contact Us | FAQ | Links |

 

The articles provided here are for your information and use in publications. Copyrights cited for each apply.

Each reprint must include the author's name and contact information for the Law Offices of Herbert D. Hinkle, Esq.

 

Return to the list of online articles

 

Online Articles

Is Guardianship Necessary?

by
Herbert D. Hinkle, Esq. and Ira M. Fingles, Esq.

Herbert D. Hinkle Law Office
2651 Main Street
Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648
(609) 896-4200 or (215) 860-2100

 

Frequently, families ask whether guardianship is necessary and express concern that they might be taking away important rights from their sons and daughters with disabilities. Here are my thoughts:

In both Pennsylvania and New Jersey, the standard for guardianship concerns the capacity to govern oneself and manage oneās affairs. If a person lacks this capacity, he or she cannot make decisions.

For example, suppose John is moderately mentally retarded, age 30 and has no guardian. John needs surgery. If successful, Johnās life expectancy and vitality will increase. If unsuccessful, John might die. John has a very limited understanding of how the human body works. He cannot balance the pros and cons and often will sometimes say what he thinks others want him to say.

John lacks the capacity to make a decision and cannot give legally valid consent, even though there is no guardian. A legal vacuum exists. Sometime, doctors and hospitals will accept the consent of the parents, but his is not legal and it does not always happen. If the parents disagree with each other, or if there are no parents living, the situation can be even more chaotic.

Another example: Recently, parents removed their son from a residential program in which he was regressing. The parents asked the state to consider placement in a more expensive, but also more suitable program. The state declined to consider placement, advising the parents that their son is his own guardian and when asked where he wanted to live, he failed to mention this program.

Legally, this is absurd. There is no such thing as being your own guardian. A person either has the capacity to make informed decisions or not. But, to deal effectively with the situation, the parents are now seeking guardianship.

I agree with the late Elizabeth Boggs, who observed that someone without the capacity to make decisions does not lose anything under guardianship, rather guardianship enables a concerned person to help the incapacitated person to express his/her best interests.

Good practice means that a guardian should consider the preferences of the ward and allow the ward to make decisions to the extent able. Limited guardianship is indicated in some cases to legally demarcate the decisions reserved to the ward.

A few other myths: guardianship does not terminate the right to vote. Likewise, the failure to obtain guardianship does not make it easier to obtain state services. On the other hand, once a parent becomes guardian, he/she can name a successor under both a power of attorney and a will. In New Jersey this is binding; in Pennsylvania, it is not binding, but persuasive.

Many related topics are discussed in other articles on this website.

 

Copyright 2000 H.D. Hinkle. All rights reserved.


Mr. Hinkle maintains a multi-state law practice with offices in Lawrenceville, Florham Park, and Marlton, NJ, and Yardley, Pa. Mr. Hinkle and his colleagues Ira Fingles, and Paul Prior lecture and write frequently on topics of law, aging, and disability, and are available to speak to groups in New Jersey and Pennsylvania at no charge. Call (609) 896-4200.

 

 

| Home | Services | Workshops | In Print | Attorneys | Contact Us | FAQ | Links |