| Home | Services | Workshops | In Print | Attorneys | Contact Us | FAQ | Links |

 

The articles provided here are for your information and use in publications. Copyrights cited for each apply.

Each reprint must include the author's name and contact information for the Law Offices of Herbert D. Hinkle, Esq.

 

Return to the list of online articles

 

Online Articles

Mandatory After-School Services

by
Herbert D. Hinkle, Esq. and Ira M. Fingles, Esq.

Herbert D. Hinkle Law Office
2651 Main Street
Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648
(609) 896-4200 or (215) 860-2100

In May 2001, a New Jersey administrative law judge ruled that under federal law a school district must provide after-school services to a child with disabilities because it provides such services to non-handicapped children. S.A. v. Monroe Twp. BOE, (OAL Docket No. EDS 331-00). Because the decision was based on federal law, it is relevant to children in Pennsylvania and in all other states.

S.A. is a nine-year-old child with autism who was placed by his school district in a private out-of-district school. S.A.'s parents approached the District about the availability of after-school services and were told none were available. The parents then provided services at their own expense. Later, by chance, they learned that the District offered after-school services to children who needed extra help reaching grade level in math and reading.

The parents sued under a federal anti-discrimination law known as Section 504 (29 U.S.C.A. ¤794(a)), seeking future services and reimbursement for the cost of past services. The Court ruled that whenever a District voluntarily provides services it must offer them to handicapped children or provide the alternative services necessary for meaningful enjoyment. The Court also found that the District had an affirmative obligation to tell the parents about the availability of after-school services; therefore, it did not matter when the parents actually requested services. Finally, the Court rejected the undue hardship argument.

The Court awarded the parents reimbursement for the services they provided, including reimbursement for transportation. (The District is also liable for reimbursement of attorney fees under Section 504.) As of this writing, it is anticipated that the issue of future services will be settled.

 

Copyright 2001 H.D. Hinkle. All rights reserved.

 

Mr. Hinkle maintains a multi-state law practice with offices in Lawrenceville, Florham Park, and Marlton, NJ, and Yardley, Pa. Mr. Hinkle and his colleagues Ira Fingles, and Paul Prior lecture and write frequently on topics of law, aging, and disability, and are available to speak to groups in New Jersey and Pennsylvania at no charge. Call (609) 896-4200.

 

 

| Home | Services | Workshops | In Print | Attorneys | Contact Us | FAQ | Links |