The articles provided here are for your information and use in publications. Copyrights cited for each apply.

Each reprint must include the author's name and contact information for Hinkle & Fingles

 

Return to the list of online articles

 

'Real Life Choices' Funding Caps May Conflict With State & Federal Law

by
Herbert D. Hinkle, Esq. and Valerie A. Powers Smith, Esq.

Hinkle & Fingles, Attorneys at Law
2651 Main Street
Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648
(609) 896-4200 or (215) 860-2100


In an effort to contain costs, the New Jersey Division of Developmental Disabilities has replaced its Self-Determination Project with a program called “Real Life Choices” (“RLC”). Under RLC, clients who are eligible for residential placement may opt for this program instead.

Under RLC, a client is assigned to 1 of 4 funding levels depending on the nature of the disability. Families can then use the funding to set up their own program. This approach is controversial because funding is not based on individual needs and the actual costs of service. Rather, funding is set artificially according to the funding level assigned.

While RLC may be beneficial to some clients, it conflicts with the Medicaid-funded Community Care Waiver (CCW) that is used to fund it. Among the services provided under the CCW are: case management, respite care, habilitation (including pre-vocational, educational, and supported employment services), home and vehicle accessibility adaptations, personal emergency response systems, therapies, and other individual supports.

Before RLC, whenever a DDD client/CCW recipient needed a service covered under the CCW, it was provided. Now, access to needed CCW services has been restricted in some cases because of the RLC funding level assigned acts as a cap. CCW and other Medicaid programs prohibit limiting services to a certain dollar amount.

The RLC funding caps also run afoul of the New Jersey Developmentally Disabled Rights Act, which emphasized planning (Individual Habilitation Plan) to meet all of a client’s individual needs; and a mandate that services provided by DDD must maximize developmental potential.

Hopefully, DDD will iron out the problems with RLC as it gains experience. For now, families experiencing difficulties can use DDD’s appeal procedures or complain to the federal Center of Medicaid & Medicare Services (CMS).
 ______

Herbert D. Hinkle, his partner, Ira M. Fingles, and their colleagues, S. Paul Prior and Valerie A. Powers Smith, maintain a statewide law practice with offices in Lawrenceville, Marlton, and Florham Park, New Jersey, and Yardley and Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania. They lecture and write frequently on topics of law, aging, disability and estate planning and are available to speak to groups in New Jersey and Pennsylvania at no charge.

Comments and suggestions for future articles should be mailed to: Hinkle & Fingles, 2651 Main Street, Suite A, Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648-1012.


Copyright 2004 Herbert D. Hinkle. All rights reserved.

 

 
| Profile of Services | News | Workshops | Articles | Attorneys | Contact Us | FAQ | Links |